alexandraerin:

trishatosh:

dearcispeople:

Dear Cis People:
You are not, for any reason, under any circumstances, by any means, allowed to have an opinion on my identity. It does not work that way. Get over yourselves, you are not the gender police. Gender is not a simple 2-position switch, I’m allowed to mix and match. Get over that, too.

I really just don’t like all these anti-cis sentiments out there. It is absolutely stupid to lump all non-trans identifying people into one group and assume that they’re all ignorant jerks. It creates a schism which in turn delineates the world into us and them.
There is no us or them. We’re all people.

When you read a sign that says “ATTENTION LIBRARY PATRONS, THERE IS NO EATING OR DRINKING IN THE LIBRARY”, do you go up to the circulation desk to complain that it’s not fair to lump all library patrons together and you’re not like those other library patrons who would need to be told and they’re creating a needless schism between library patrons and everyone else?
No. Of course not. You understand that, as a library patron, the instructions apply to you whether you need to be told or not, but the fact that the instructions are provided don’t imply anything about you personally. And they’re addressed to library patrons because that’s who they’re aimed at. People in the sandwich shop across the street don’t need to be told there’s no eating in the library, at least not until they come over and patronize it.
This letter is addressed to cis people because that’s who it applies to. It is lumping all cis people together, but only as a category that should not be going around opining about trans* identities.
If you’re cis, there are exactly two possibilities here: either you agree that it’s not your place to do that, in which case I don’t understand why your response to this would be anything other than nodding in agreement, or you disagree, which… okay, like, that’s just your opinion or whatever, but yeah, then you’ve got no right to complain about an open letter addressed to a generalized you on the subject.
The “schism” is created by the entitlement of the privileged to think of themselves as the normal unmarked state, free from criticism and in no need of advice. And that entitlement will rear its head any time it isn’t 100% catered to, no matter how gently or politely the message (and the one above isn’t even that rude, just direct)… better to confront it and point it out when it arises than tiptoe around it and hope it goes away.

alexandraerin:

trishatosh:

dearcispeople:

Dear Cis People:

You are not, for any reason, under any circumstances, by any means, allowed to have an opinion on my identity. It does not work that way. Get over yourselves, you are not the gender police. Gender is not a simple 2-position switch, I’m allowed to mix and match. Get over that, too.

I really just don’t like all these anti-cis sentiments out there. It is absolutely stupid to lump all non-trans identifying people into one group and assume that they’re all ignorant jerks. It creates a schism which in turn delineates the world into us and them.

There is no us or them. We’re all people.

When you read a sign that says “ATTENTION LIBRARY PATRONS, THERE IS NO EATING OR DRINKING IN THE LIBRARY”, do you go up to the circulation desk to complain that it’s not fair to lump all library patrons together and you’re not like those other library patrons who would need to be told and they’re creating a needless schism between library patrons and everyone else?

No. Of course not. You understand that, as a library patron, the instructions apply to you whether you need to be told or not, but the fact that the instructions are provided don’t imply anything about you personally. And they’re addressed to library patrons because that’s who they’re aimed at. People in the sandwich shop across the street don’t need to be told there’s no eating in the library, at least not until they come over and patronize it.

This letter is addressed to cis people because that’s who it applies to. It is lumping all cis people together, but only as a category that should not be going around opining about trans* identities.

If you’re cis, there are exactly two possibilities here: either you agree that it’s not your place to do that, in which case I don’t understand why your response to this would be anything other than nodding in agreement, or you disagree, which… okay, like, that’s just your opinion or whatever, but yeah, then you’ve got no right to complain about an open letter addressed to a generalized you on the subject.

The “schism” is created by the entitlement of the privileged to think of themselves as the normal unmarked state, free from criticism and in no need of advice. And that entitlement will rear its head any time it isn’t 100% catered to, no matter how gently or politely the message (and the one above isn’t even that rude, just direct)… better to confront it and point it out when it arises than tiptoe around it and hope it goes away.

(via birchsoda)

mypetitmal:

Also, the red equality symbol people are posting everywhere as their profile pictures and such is a symbol for the Human Rights Campaign which has historically completely disregarded trans* people and trans* rights, among other shitty things.

Yeah, your ~liberal~ equality symbol might be doing good for some, but it has also harmed many others. 

(via knitmeapony)

girlslikeusnews:

Janet Mock in one fell swoop destroys the ‘trapped in the wrong body’ narrative so love by the popular media, with a tidy side swipe at the ‘coming out’ narrative.

(via searchingforknowledge)

fromonesurvivortoanother:

fauxmosexualtranstrender:

superqueerartsyblog:

✿ Walking talking queer encyclopedia with a healthy rose-cheeked smile! ✿

using a white trans guy for this image is so perf too

omg haha

fromonesurvivortoanother:

fauxmosexualtranstrender:

superqueerartsyblog:

✿ Walking talking queer encyclopedia with a healthy rose-cheeked smile! ✿

using a white trans guy for this image is so perf too

omg haha

(via bubonickitten)

thematerialworld:

A few years ago, Sarah Schulman told me about the 1973 gay pride march, which culminated in a contentious showdown between transgender activist Sylvia Rivera and lesbian feminist Jean O’Leary, who thought that drag queens were an expression of misogyny, and wanted drag performance banned from the march.

I thought I got a better sense of what that moment was like last year, when I saw footage from the event excerpted in “Vito,” a documentary about the life of Vito Russo.  

But a few hours ago, at a presentation by Reina and Che Gossett, I saw the full, unedited footage of Sylvia’s speech, and I was completely floored.  I knew that Sylvia fought at Stonewall, and helped organize the first gay pride march the next year.  What I didn’t really grasp was that, only four years later, she was essentially purged from the proceedings.  It reminds me of Harry Hay’s early years, when he was kicked out of the Mattachine Society for being a communist years after founding the Mattachine Society.  This is the history of gay/queer politics: It takes a courageous, principled human being to create change for people in the center, who then sweep the change-makers to the side.

So watch this clip, and think about all the queer and trans people of color who are currently in prisons, and ask yourself how much progress we’ve really made in the past forty years.

(via nue-sur-la-lune)

stfuhypocrisy:

redefiningbodyimage:

queerpositive:

buttscuiteer:

raverjesus:

loveyourrebellion:

D.C. Launches First Ever Transgender Respect Ad Campaign

Yes, good.

I will respect these posters forever because they put a genderfluid/genderqueer/whatever person. That is normally so overlooked.

This campaign has a lot of awesome stuff going for it.

1) Transgender PoC make up about half the face of the campaign.

2) There is a genderqueer person (!!) and their caption respectfully uses “person” instead of man or woman.

3) Plus-sized trans* people for the win!

4) Finally a campaign explicitly for trans* people that emphasizes our deserving respect and courtesy.

5) The transgender women and men are included in “any woman/man” which is huge because it emphasizes that trans* women and men are women and men too; it leaves no room for argument and doesn’t turn it into a debate about genitals.

6) Emphasis on our being a part of the communities we live in. We aren’t any different than anyone else.

I really love the DC Transgender Respect campaign and I wish more states and cities would launch stuff like this!

- Jax

^^^ All very good and true.  I saw this floating around months ago, and I’m glad it’s back, because it is a great example of how to do a visibility campaign in a way that is really inclusive and honest and respectful. 

Way to go DC.

image

always reblog

(via shwetanarayan)

weallcount:

Marsha P. Johnson, transgender gay rights activist (1944 – 1992)
Little known (or recognized) in the Stonewall Rebellion that launched gay liberation, was the role of Marsha P. Johnson and Sylvia Rivera. These two transgender activists were on the leading edge of the rebellion, battling the police, and coining the term “Whose Streets, Our Streets!”
Marsha co-founded STAR (Street Transvestite/Transgender Action Revolutionaries) with Sylvia Rivera, to help aid, feed and shelter queer/trans people without homes and those who’d runaway.
Marsha was found floating in the Hudson River shortly after the 1992 Pride March; the police declined to investigate and ruled her death suicide. Marsha P. Johnson remains a legendary figure in the fight for queer liberation as part of the struggle for racial and economic justice.

weallcount:

Marsha P. Johnson, transgender gay rights activist (1944 – 1992)

Little known (or recognized) in the Stonewall Rebellion that launched gay liberation, was the role of Marsha P. Johnson and Sylvia Rivera. These two transgender activists were on the leading edge of the rebellion, battling the police, and coining the term “Whose Streets, Our Streets!”

Marsha co-founded STAR (Street Transvestite/Transgender Action Revolutionaries) with Sylvia Rivera, to help aid, feed and shelter queer/trans people without homes and those who’d runaway.

Marsha was found floating in the Hudson River shortly after the 1992 Pride March; the police declined to investigate and ruled her death suicide. Marsha P. Johnson remains a legendary figure in the fight for queer liberation as part of the struggle for racial and economic justice.

(via aragingquiet)

girljanitor:

1. Police assault a gay man. It is reported and framed as an “anti-gay” attack. White gay people say “look at the terrible violence we face!”

He is a black man.

2. Feminists decry the horrific new developments in regard to the criminalization of pregnancy, i.e. people with uteri who…

political-linguaphile:

wearenomadique:

Crossing Over tells the particular and complex story of the transgender Latin immigrant community in Los Angeles through three of its most distinctive members.

Brenda came to the United States from Mexico over ten years ago to escape mental and physical abuse, and after initially struggling to survive in the U.S. by any means possible, eventually sought asylum and was allowed to stay. Brenda works as a community advocate and HIV support-group leader, but it is her vivacious personality and light that truly makes her a matriarch among her community.

Abigail is newer to the US than Brenda, and though she too has sought asylum, she is still figuring out how to get by. She works as a nightclub dancer and quinceñara planner in order to put herself through community college. While she dreams of eventually becoming a lawyer to fight for the rights of people like her, she must battle what seem like insurmountable demons to achieve her goals—depression, addiction, and poverty.

Francis has worked for a decade as a housekeeper and caretaker for the same family in Los Angeles, and is on the brink of the final asylum hearing that will determine whether she can remain in the United States.

Each subject lives a very different facet of the trans-Latina experience, and yet the message that their stories convey is unified and clear—that this is a community that has faced inconceivable abuses and yet have risen to create an environment of love, leadership, and support, and for these reasons deserve to live in this country.

Watch the trailer below:

Crossing Over is currently in the stages of post-production.Look for the finished product September 2013. Katrina Sorrentino, from Nomadique, is the Producer for Crossing Over. This post was written by Alex Pitz, who is the Associate Producer and screenwriter for Crossing Over.

Photos taken by Isabel Castro


Very cool. I made a post about this documentary a few months back. You can check out the post and watch the trailer here. That post says that film was set to come out in January of this year, but it seems it has been delayed. Either way keep an eye out for this documentary. It looks amazing!

(via evelark)

eshusplayground:

sinidentidades:

It’s an all too common, if shocking story: A transgender Latina woman with HIV is attacked on a street close to her home in a low-income neighborhood in the Bay Area. Making a bad situation worse, police officers literally drag her from her bed at 6 a.m. because they think she committed the crime herself.

“They kept telling her she wasn’t who she was, and that she was a man,” explained María Carolina Morales of the San Francisco-based Communities United Against Violence as she recounted the incident to Colorlines. “She was arrested. She was taken to the station. She wasn’t listened to. She spent the weekend in jail.”

The woman went to court a month after her arrest, but disappeared shortly after her court date.

“She was somebody who was unemployed, who didn’t have a safety net,” noted Morales. “We don’t know if she ran away, if she ended up in jail or [was] transferred to another place, another city. Her phone was disconnected the day after court. We just don’t know—don’t know what happened.”

The National Coalition of Anti-Violence Programs released its annual report on hate violence motivated by sexual orientation, gender identity and expression and HIV status last week. The report documents 27 anti-LGBT murders in 2010, which is the second highest annual total recorded since 1996. A whopping 70 percent of these 27 victims were people of color; 44 percent of them were transgender women.

The study also found that transgender people and people of color are each twice as likely to experience violence or discrimination as non-transgender white people. Transgender people of color are also almost 2.5 times as likely to experience discrimination as their white peers.

“It wasn’t a shock,” said Morales, whose organization is among the 17 anti-violence programs from across the country that contributed data to the NCAVP report. “For the last four years we’ve seen that trend—of transgender women and people of color in our communities experiencing higher levels of violence. Sadly that continues.”

Recent headlines certainly bear witness to this disturbing trend.

A Milwaukee judge sentenced Andrew Olaciregui to an 11-year prison sentence in December after he pleaded guilty to shooting Chanel Larkin three times in the head on a street corner in May 2010. Prosecutors maintain Olaciregui shot Larkin after he offered to pay her $20 to perform a sex act and found out she was transgender. Larkin was 26 at the time of her death.

In another high-profile case, Hakim Scott and Keith Phoenix both received decades-long prison sentences last summer for their role in the death of Ecuadorian immigrant José Sucuzhañay on a Brooklyn street in December 2008. Prosecutors contend Scott and Phoenix shouted anti-gay and anti-Latino slurs at Sucuzhañay as they attacked him with a baseball bat and bottles.

Juan José Matos Martínez received a 99-year prison sentence in May 2010 after he pleaded guilty to stabbing gay Puerto Rican teenager Jorge Steven López Mercado to death before decapitating, dismembering and partially burning his body and dumping it along a remote roadside in November 2009.

So what causes disproportionate rates of violence against transgender people and queer people of color?

“What the 2010 report allows us to do is document something we’ve seen and experienced for a long time,” said Ejeris Dixon of the New York City Anti-Violence Project, which wrote the bulk of the NCAVP report. “It’s really about an intersection of oppression.”

Dixon, who was a long-time staffer at Brooklyn-based Audre Lorde Project until she joined AVP earlier this year, said a lack of employment, housing and health care for transgender people all contribute to disproportionate rates of violence. Morales said that ongoing police harassment against these communities is an additional factor, making those most at-risk for hate violence also least likely to seek help.

“All of those things sanction violence,” said Dixon.

The NCAVP report found that half of those who experienced hate violence did not contact the police after their attack. The report further found that 25.4 percent of transgender women did not file a report. So what can be done to reduce these rates of violence against LGBT people and communities of color?

The Audre Lorde Project is among the groups that organize LGBT people in communities of color that are increasingly looking beyond law enforcement and the criminal justice system for a solution. The Safe OUTside the System Collective works with bodegas, businesses and organizations within Brooklyn’s Bedford-Stuyvesant neighborhood and surrounding areas to create safe spaces for LGBT people of color to curb violence.

“What’s true and important is our communities have been and continue to organize around issues of harassment—whether it’s neighborhood or community harassment or [harassment] by the police,” said Kris Hayashi, executive director of the Audre Lorde Project.

Morales stressed that empowering transgender people and people of color to participate in decision making processes around employment, health care, improved access to food and affordable housing is another key component to addressing the problem. “For that, our organizations and institutions need to prioritize opening spaces for people to develop their leadership, to be able to engage, to learn and make decisions and so that they can see themselves not only reflected, but see themselves in the process.”

Another potential solution is for anti-violence programs to tackle some of the underlying disparities that contribute to increased violence against LGBT people and people of color.

“That can mean a lot of things: We can talk about low-cost programs, intersections with immigration rights groups,” said Dixon. “It’s about crafting programming that focuses on these populations and also developing leadership of LGBT people of color and trans people.”

While Morales conceded these most recent statistics are grim, she said she remains hopeful that they will allow her organization and others around the country to develop more effective strategies to tackle hate violence. She stressed, however, this hasn’t happened as much as she would like to see.

“It hasn’t been significantly stepped up enough,” said Morales, referring to strategies to further engage community members in the solution. “However, I have seen a lot more conversations and dialogue opening up around the community—the prison population continues to significantly increase every year, and violence continues to increase. I don’t believe its working. COAV doesn’t believe its working. I am hopeful [the report] will open up more opportunities to question the strategy to violence response.”

And this is why more visibility of LGBTQ POCs is so crucial. The endless parade of Pretty White Boy Love and the lack of [trans*] women of color plays into how this reality consistently gets ignored.

(via searchingforknowledge)

tranqualizer:

queersex:

unapproachableblackchicks:


Unless you’ve been following the work of Monica Roberts, The Opposing Views and David Lohr over atThe Huffington Post, you probably don’t know that a trans teenage girl from Charlottesville, Va., has been missing for nearly 20 days.
Since Sage Smith was first reported missing on Nov. 22, there has been virtually no mainstream media coverage of her abduction. There has only been one local story produced, and in it reporters consistently use the wrong pronouns to identify her, and the story only mentions the name she lives by once, as though it were a nickname. Even worse, the local authorities who are spearheading the search for her have reportedly lost their suspect without much hope of finding her.
….


The failure to show LGBTQ people of color as active and vital members of our communities and families perpetuates the dangerous stereotype that LGBTQ people of color are either nonexistent or that our identities are invalid. The media has failed to shine light on the targeted violence that trans women of color continue to endure. According to the National Coalition of Anti-Violence Programs, 40 percent of anti-LGBT murder victims in 2011 were transgender women; there have been 11 reported murders of trans women in the U.S. this year alone. The media have also failed to contextualize that violence alongside the discrimination that trans women of color face as a result of racism, misogyny and transphobia, and most Americans are unaware of these severe disparities in access and opportunity. Were any of these things factors in Sage’s disappearance? We don’t know. But by ignoring her story, the media are further alienating an already marginalized community and identity. We’ve seen this story before. Remember Mitrice Richardson? She was a 24-year-old African-American lesbian woman who was missing for nearly a year before police uncovered her dead body.

Praying for her safe return.
xX KCB xX

Breaks my heart

Sage has been missing since Nov. 22nd - it’s been over a month month.
you can find more information on how to support the efforts to bring Sage home safely here

tranqualizer:

queersex:

unapproachableblackchicks:

Unless you’ve been following the work of Monica RobertsThe Opposing Views and David Lohr over atThe Huffington Post, you probably don’t know that a trans teenage girl from Charlottesville, Va., has been missing for nearly 20 days.

Since Sage Smith was first reported missing on Nov. 22, there has been virtually no mainstream media coverage of her abduction. There has only been one local story produced, and in it reporters consistently use the wrong pronouns to identify her, and the story only mentions the name she lives by once, as though it were a nickname. Even worse, the local authorities who are spearheading the search for her have reportedly lost their suspect without much hope of finding her.

….

The failure to show LGBTQ people of color as active and vital members of our communities and families perpetuates the dangerous stereotype that LGBTQ people of color are either nonexistent or that our identities are invalid. The media has failed to shine light on the targeted violence that trans women of color continue to endure. According to the National Coalition of Anti-Violence Programs, 40 percent of anti-LGBT murder victims in 2011 were transgender women; there have been 11 reported murders of trans women in the U.S. this year alone. The media have also failed to contextualize that violence alongside the discrimination that trans women of color face as a result of racism, misogyny and transphobia, and most Americans are unaware of these severe disparities in access and opportunity. Were any of these things factors in Sage’s disappearance? We don’t know. But by ignoring her story, the media are further alienating an already marginalized community and identity. We’ve seen this story before. Remember Mitrice Richardson? She was a 24-year-old African-American lesbian woman who was missing for nearly a year before police uncovered her dead body.

Praying for her safe return.

xX KCB xX

Breaks my heart

Sage has been missing since Nov. 22nd - it’s been over a month month.

you can find more information on how to support the efforts to bring Sage home safely here

(via girljanitor)

provocatoria:

vegan-asshole:

becausewemustdotorg:

Don’t get us wrong, we feel for Pussy Riot, but we wish Cece got this much attention. Pussy Riot has gotten a lot of attention, how about giving Cece some? Get together with your friends and write to Cece!
Free Pussy Riot. Free Cece! Free all political prisoners!

You can care about more than one thing at a time.

Naw,son.You really missed the point. A bunch of white women get thrown into jail and my whole internet exploded. I get e-mails/facebook messages about solidarity rallies for Pussy Riot every other day from people that I barely talk to. There is a HUGE disparity between the response to Pussy Riot and Cece. Don’t play like people who are pointing this disparity out are being divisive or some shit.I will rep Cece a million times harder than Pussy Riot because I know Pussy Riot has a bunch of angry white activists at their disposal. White folks got that shit handled all over the internets, so excuse me if I give some play to Cece and her largely forgotten case.
#tumblramnesia

provocatoria:

vegan-asshole:

becausewemustdotorg:

Don’t get us wrong, we feel for Pussy Riot, but we wish Cece got this much attention. Pussy Riot has gotten a lot of attention, how about giving Cece some? Get together with your friends and write to Cece!

Free Pussy Riot. Free Cece! Free all political prisoners!

You can care about more than one thing at a time.

Naw,son.
You really missed the point.

A bunch of white women get thrown into jail and my whole internet exploded.
I get e-mails/facebook messages about solidarity rallies for Pussy Riot every other day from people that I barely talk to. There is a HUGE disparity between the response to Pussy Riot and Cece. Don’t play like people who are pointing this disparity out are being divisive or some shit.

I will rep Cece a million times harder than Pussy Riot because I know Pussy Riot has a bunch of angry white activists at their disposal. White folks got that shit handled all over the internets, so excuse me if I give some play to Cece and her largely forgotten case.

#tumblramnesia

(Source: burningheartsmedia, via angelsscream)

Another letter to Neil Gaiman about his support of Laci Green and lack of support for others

shwetanarayan:

My letter is a follow-up/riff off this letter.  If you’re only going to read one, please read that one.

I’d just like to add something to what Riley said, Mr. Gaiman.  Like them, I have reason to be grateful to you.  You won’t remember it, but you were really supportive of my attempts some years ago to wrangle with DC and get image permissions, when I was trying to publish my undergrad thesis on Sandman in an academic journal.  It didn’t work out, but I appreciate your support.  Please understand that my appreciation it is why I’m speaking up here, and bringing up context that I am ashamed of and somewhat endangered by, rather than just writing you off entirely.

Mr. Gaiman, there is a pattern here.  It played out during RaceFail’09, too. There were huge angry internet arguments.  At the same time, some white people received death threats.  There was NO CONNECTION between these two beyond circumstance - the people making the threats were not the people arguing angrily, but rather trolls who saw an opportunity to escalate the situation.  So.  The connection was made anyway, and WOC - who were being harrassed awfully, and in public - were blamed for the threats and called abusers, and the threats were used as an excuse to dismiss their arguments.

(I don’t feel safe naming names, but I believe you know some of the white people involved, Mr. Gaiman.  I’m ashamed to say that they were friends of mine at the time.  They were definitely guilty of harrassment and abuse themselves.  It took me a long time to fully understand this because they lied to me in private about the source of the abuse they were receiving, saying it provably came from a certain WOC.)

I mention all this because I didn’t get it either, Mr. Gaiman.  I only saw the part of the picture where a (white) woman was receiving horrible threats, and I was deeply upset about that.  And it is upsetting.  But it is only one part of the picture, and the rest is even more upsetting if you will open your eyes to it.

The people arguing with Laci Green are angry, and some of them surely hate her.  They are not doing, or condoning, any of the stalking, death threats, other harassment. 

When you conflate the two, and use the threats to dismiss the online arguments, and ignore the fact that several of the people arguing with Ms. Green are also facing stalking, death threats, other harassment, you reinforce the belief that only some people are human, and worthy of anger and defence.

As Riley says much better than me, not-hating is much easier to do when you’re not actively endangered.  Do you think Laci Green shouldn’t hate the people harassing her?  If not, why would you think the people she’s harassed, and treated as subhuman, and helped to actively endanger, shouldn’t hate her?    They are not the ones harassing her, or condoning the harassment.  This does not go both ways.  It does not cancel out.  It is not a reason, nor even an excuse, to refuse to hear and respect what people who are harmed by Laci Green’s racism, transphobia, and Islamophobia - are angry about in the first place.

(via searchingforknowledge)

Can anyone give me a source on Mark Ruffalo supporting trans* rights?

He’s involved with the Human Rights Campaign and has spoken out for marriage equality, but… that is a whole different thing.  And so far the only thing I can find about him speaking up for trans* people is just a bunch of reblogs of the same Tumblr post.

"Speaking from the perspective and the tradition of lesbians of color, most if not all rationales for excluding transsexual women are not only transphobic, but also racist. To argue that transsexual women should not enter the Land because their experiences are different would have to assume that all other women’s experiences are the same, and this is a racist assumption. The argument that transsexual women have experienced some degree of male privilege should not bar them from our communities once we realize that not all women are equally privileged or oppressed. To suggest that the safety of the Land would be compromised overlooks, perhaps intentionally, ways in which women can act out violence and oppressions against each other. Even the argument that “the presence of a penis would trigger the women” is flawed because it neglects the fact that white skin is just as much a reminder of violence as a penis. The racist history of lesbian-feminism has taught us that any white woman making these excuses for one oppression have made and will make the same excuse for other oppressions such as racism, classism, and ableism."

Emi Koyama’s “Whose feminism is it, anyway?” (via wewantrevolutiongirlstylenow)

THIS.  This is exactly what I was trying to explain earlier, only much more articulately done.

(via strangeasanjles)

I may have reblogged this before.  I do not care.

(via fracturedrefuge)

(Source: eminism.org, via dansphalluspalace)