pomme-poire-peche:

neetainari:

robotribble:

buttart:

neetainari:

Yeah, what exactly happened? Because this is a picture combining two paintings of virtually indistinguishable rich white ladies. With text saying “Women - What the fuck happened?”
Further into the reblogs, someone has even proclaimed to hate “women today”. I just can’t make any sense of this at all.
So, my most venerable followers, here’s an Internet meme challenge: Can somebody tell me what, exactly, is the meaning of this picture? That red went out of fashion several art periods ago among the upper fucking crust and that’s an invitation to hate “women today”?!

Yeah I have no idea
Thoughts?

WOMEN ARE NO LONGER PURELY  SUBSERVIENT AND ARE NOT BOUND TO RIDICULOUS FASHION STANDARDS THAT COULD POTENTIALLY CAUSE PHYSICAL HARM DUE TO THEIR SEVERITY it is a TRAVESTY, I KNOW.
That is the only conclusion I can come to that makes sense in regards to that ridiculous statement.  I simply can’t.

Yet somehow the popularity of plastic fucking surgery is SKYROCKETING and clothes brands don’t even bother to use real women’s bodies to display their cheap shit any more. Please tell me how we are no longer subjected to ridiculous and potentially harmful fashion standards.

I can’t even tell whether the meme maker means, “Check out these old paintings of women and compare them to women today,” or “Compare these two paintings amongst themselves” in which case the complaint is about… the beauty standards of the early 19th century, or something? 
It’s like being beaten by an angry mob with illegible banners: you know it’s offensive, but the message is too incoherent for you to determine precisely how. 

Actually, this graphic is mocking other graphics that were created to make the ahistorical and misogynistic point that “today’s women” are “vapid sluts” (compared to women of the 1920s or whatever).
If you didn’t see the original graphics, I can understand how it would be confusing.

pomme-poire-peche:

neetainari:

robotribble:

buttart:

neetainari:

Yeah, what exactly happened? Because this is a picture combining two paintings of virtually indistinguishable rich white ladies. With text saying “Women - What the fuck happened?”

Further into the reblogs, someone has even proclaimed to hate “women today”. I just can’t make any sense of this at all.

So, my most venerable followers, here’s an Internet meme challenge: Can somebody tell me what, exactly, is the meaning of this picture? That red went out of fashion several art periods ago among the upper fucking crust and that’s an invitation to hate “women today”?!

Yeah I have no idea

Thoughts?

WOMEN ARE NO LONGER PURELY SUBSERVIENT AND ARE NOT BOUND TO RIDICULOUS FASHION STANDARDS THAT COULD POTENTIALLY CAUSE PHYSICAL HARM DUE TO THEIR SEVERITY it is a TRAVESTY, I KNOW.

That is the only conclusion I can come to that makes sense in regards to that ridiculous statement. I simply can’t.

Yet somehow the popularity of plastic fucking surgery is SKYROCKETING and clothes brands don’t even bother to use real women’s bodies to display their cheap shit any more. Please tell me how we are no longer subjected to ridiculous and potentially harmful fashion standards.

I can’t even tell whether the meme maker means, “Check out these old paintings of women and compare them to women today,” or “Compare these two paintings amongst themselves” in which case the complaint is about… the beauty standards of the early 19th century, or something? 

It’s like being beaten by an angry mob with illegible banners: you know it’s offensive, but the message is too incoherent for you to determine precisely how. 

Actually, this graphic is mocking other graphics that were created to make the ahistorical and misogynistic point that “today’s women” are “vapid sluts” (compared to women of the 1920s or whatever).

If you didn’t see the original graphics, I can understand how it would be confusing.

(Source: jerrymuffinbutt)

My Tumblr summed up in 7 Questions.

omgwtfhedwig:

  • URL: cabell
  • Top 5 fandoms you’ll see: Avengers (currently the big one), Due South, X-Men, Community, Star Trek
  • Top 4 celebrities you’ll see: Terry Pratchett (quotes), RDJ (mainly as Iron Man), Chris Evans (mainly as Captain America), Chris Hemsworth (mainly as Thor)
  • Top 3 other topics you’ll see: Social justice/related educational materials, pregnancy talk, nail polish
  • Do I make graphics? Only as mix CD covers.
  • Do I liveblog? Sometimes, but usually via Twitter when I do.
  • My Ask Box is: Always open, though not to anons.

(via n-o-o-n-e-i-m-p-o-r-t-a-n-t-dea)

Tags: memes meta

ktempest:

starkwords:

mellifluous-rain:

tyleroakley:

I’m literally dying.
I want so much for her to know we’re reblogging this conversation.

yesssss

God this person does not belong on tumblr. 

thios is what happens when shit gets popular and the newbies roll in, suddenly it’s all OMG STOP FOLLOWING ME IF I DON’T KNOW WHO YOU ARE I WISH THIS WAS MORE LIKE FACEBOOK OMG STOP REBLOGGING MY POSTS BE ORIGINAL I WISH THIS WAS MORE LIKE TWITTER OMG STOP POSTING IN ABSTRACT ART SQUIGGLES AND CANDY I WISH THIS WAS MORE LIKE TUMBLR.

I swear I had only been on Tumblr for like a week last year when some visual kei fangirl got her panties in a twist over me (and other people, I guess?) following her account after she posted some interesting art, because OBVIOUSLY WE WEREN’T THE KIND OF PEOPLE WHO OUGHT TO BE FOLLOWING HER.
I allowed as how I was, somehow, suddenly less interested in her Tumblr and unfollowed.  I assume she was satisfied?

ktempest:

starkwords:

mellifluous-rain:

tyleroakley:

I’m literally dying.

I want so much for her to know we’re reblogging this conversation.

yesssss

God this person does not belong on tumblr. 

thios is what happens when shit gets popular and the newbies roll in, suddenly it’s all OMG STOP FOLLOWING ME IF I DON’T KNOW WHO YOU ARE I WISH THIS WAS MORE LIKE FACEBOOK OMG STOP REBLOGGING MY POSTS BE ORIGINAL I WISH THIS WAS MORE LIKE TWITTER OMG STOP POSTING IN ABSTRACT ART SQUIGGLES AND CANDY I WISH THIS WAS MORE LIKE TUMBLR.

I swear I had only been on Tumblr for like a week last year when some visual kei fangirl got her panties in a twist over me (and other people, I guess?) following her account after she posted some interesting art, because OBVIOUSLY WE WEREN’T THE KIND OF PEOPLE WHO OUGHT TO BE FOLLOWING HER.

I allowed as how I was, somehow, suddenly less interested in her Tumblr and unfollowed.  I assume she was satisfied?

(Source: heylylemalone)

Tags: meta tumblr

discopotential:

Here. I made it easy for you, Tumblr.

Plagiarism makes the Middleman rage.

discopotential:

Here. I made it easy for you, Tumblr.

Plagiarism makes the Middleman rage.

(via errantpedant)

[ cloud overview | get your own cloud ]
This is a Tumblr Cloud I generated from my blog posts between Apr 2011 and Jul 2011 containing my top 20 used words.Top 5 blogs I reblogged the most:
meloukhia
radicallyhottoff
therotund
so-treu
liquornspice
Am I proud there are two swears in my cloud?  A LITTLE BIT.
I would say the two most surprising words are “little” and “pretty.”  I especially would have expected “cute” to beat pretty.
[ cloud overview | get your own cloud ]



This is a Tumblr Cloud I generated from my blog posts between Apr 2011 and Jul 2011 containing my top 20 used words.

Top 5 blogs I reblogged the most:

Am I proud there are two swears in my cloud?  A LITTLE BIT.

I would say the two most surprising words are “little” and “pretty.”  I especially would have expected “cute” to beat pretty.

 werewolfqueen replied to your photo:NAIL STAMP SUCCESS. (Okay, I smudged a couple of…

Fucking fierce! I tried to do leopard freehand the other day. Didn’t work out quite the way that I planned. Haha. I’m definitely gonna buy those stamps ASAP.

Thanks!  One thing I discovered by accident while trying to correct a smudge is that if you drop a VERY small drop of nail polish onto your nail and then blot it with a q-tip, you get something that looks very leopard spotty.

I think the stamp ends up being a lot less time-consuming, though.

Tags: nail art meta

a friendly reminder that if you are on the internet, you are in a position of privilege.

True, but there are levels of privilege there, too.  Low-income youth often have access to the internet via mobile phones—so not needing to rely on good mobile sites or apps (as smart phones become cheaper) for web access is a form of privilege separate from the privilege of having any internet access at all. (Interestingly, Tumblr’s iPhone app is pretty damn good—I’ve been wondering if that will enhance its use by lower income people who rely on mobile access, but it would have to also have at least a good Blackberry app, and I don’t know if that’s the case.)

I would argue that having PRIVATE desktop/laptop access is another privilege, available to people who own their own computers; this allows them to, say, look at huge piles of Tumblr porn with relative freedom—that and being able to engage in other not-necessarily-parent/teacher-endorsed online pursuits is a major component, in my opinion, of developing internet-related skills.

People are motivated to learn when there’s porn as a carrot—and learning internet skills reinforces privilege, since those skills then enhance access to all kinds of resources.

(via summoner-controller-kel-deactiv)

fuckyeahsocialnorms

 

fuckyeahsociologystudentsheep:

Just a question, does the URL really need to be fuckyeah? Personally I think it would be better without it. Just putting that out there. ssxvi

Well, I REALLY like Sociology, and Fuck Yeah is a pretty good intensifier.

What does everyone else think?

What I think is: This is Tumblr. Of course the URL is “fuckyeah.”

Because it’s Tumblr, this is an interesting objection—it seems to me like a kind of boundary maintenance, but whose?  The sociology enthusiast who doesn’t really care for the norms of Tumblr yet is here anyway?  Of course, norms are always contested by somebody; no culture is monolithic.  But “fuckyeah” is a pretty major Tumblr trope.  This really does seem to me like an attempt to force a group of which one is not an integrated part to conform to norms that are not widely accepted by the group as a whole.

This is a big part of my dissertation research on Facebook: how norms develop in a new technological milieu; how they are shaped by users based on the normative frameworks of other environments but also how the specific features of the technology encourage some behaviors/norms, accommodate some others, and actively DIScourage yet others.  With Facebook’s concerted effort to tie in to people’s legal identities and face-to-face network, norms about swearing seem to me similar there as in face-to-face interaction—which is to say that they vary broadly depending on participants’ definition of the situation, but there is certainly no blanket embrace of profanity.

Generally, I would say that in mainstream US culture, outside of certain informally defined interactions, there is a strong norm against swearing on the grounds that it is “low class” or “ignorant.”  (And thus it can be effective for demonstrating intimacy, because you are being so “low class” and informal with another person.) But why?  Swear words are evocative; they can be quite creative; they certainly convey strong emotion.

They aren’t part of the prestige dialect—and yet, it’s easier to use them without being judged ignorant when you can otherwise use the prestige dialect with ease.  I swear constantly, but then, I’m a middle-class White woman.  Possibly everyone secretly thinks I’m ignorant.  But even if they do, the point is that they feel compelled to keep it a secret.

(My background here: I have my Masters in Sociology from the University of Wisconsin-Madison; I am now working on my dissertation at Madison.  I’m presenting on information disclosure on Facebook at ASA this year; last year I gave a talk on profile picture selection and photo-sharing more generally, both rich topics for the discussion of norm development and competing normative frameworks.)

I am proud to say that I have never been the anonymous person telling people that they’re too ugly, fat, or should go die.

I appreciate the sentiment behind this, but I feel that “proud” is a bit strong when you’re asserting that you have adhered to basic standards of human decency.

(Not to single out anyone for the reblog; I’ve seen this 5 or 6 times this weekend.)

(Source: mols, via liquornspice)

suchahipster:

For Cabell, if she hasn’t seen it. (And hopefully she’ll notice this post)

It’s like this future article is WRITING ITSELF.
Is this why you replied to my last post with ellipses?  I’d hate to think you were judging my nail polish habit. :p

suchahipster:

For Cabell, if she hasn’t seen it. (And hopefully she’ll notice this post)

It’s like this future article is WRITING ITSELF.

Is this why you replied to my last post with ellipses?  I’d hate to think you were judging my nail polish habit. :p

(Source: fffrankthetank)

tehblackbirdisflying:

I MADE Y’ALL A GPOM

Future article data, yo.

tehblackbirdisflying:

I MADE Y’ALL A GPOM

Future article data, yo.

(via thefirthblackbirdisflying-deact)

yearverilyyea:

National Book Week. Grab the book closest to you, turn to page 56, post the 5th sentence as your status. Copy the rules as part of your status.

To make a better myth, American culture has perpetuated the idea that Columbus was boldly forging ahead while everyone else, even his own crew, imagined the world was flat.

- James W. Loewen, Lies My Teacher Told Me: Everything Your American History Textbook Got Wrong

I’ve read the book before, but I keep pulling it out to re-read a chapter or two. A poor depiction of history can encourage poor interpretation of the present. The importance of studying history is more than not repeating the past, it’s understanding that present conditions are neither natural nor the best of all possible worlds.

I just lent this book to a student!  Who is actually following my tumblr, as it happens. :p

I used to assign a chapter from it for Race & Ethnicity, but now I just assign the introduction to Sundown Towns—you know, the one that Privilege-Denying Dude thought was “biased.”

(via yeaverilyyea-deactivated2011071)

I remember when I thought I was too old for Facebook.

 goldenagecostumes replied to your post:Not ironic, really, just kind of a catch-22

Hah. I will be victorious over tumblr.

Careful.  I think that’s how it gets you. :p

Having simultaneous convos in two different platforms… geeks or AWESOMEST GEEKS.

Let’s play the tumblr drinking game tonight.

tehblackbirdisflying:

thegoddessfoo:

nerdling:

nom-chompsky:

thekingofcupsexpectsapicnic:

Take a shot every time you get a tumblbeast?

Are you trying to kill us all?!?!?!

How about a gulp of wine? I don’t have anything to take shots of… 

Already in progress:

I swear I am going to write a paper about online communities engaging in synchronous-but-geographically-separated drinking games.  It’s a really interesting aspect of them as “third places” (I co-authored a paper about MMOGs as third places a few years ago).

Also, I was WONDERING if the tumblbeast page was always this frequent.

(Source: thekingofcupssexpectsapicnic, via thefirthblackbirdisflying-deact)

Ahahahahahahahahahahaha.  I love this—a whole chapter of my dissertation is about profile pictures and photo albums, and a general theme through the whole thing (which is all about Facebook) is how norms develop, such as what kind of picture is seen as “good.”  Many interview participants have told me that they don’t like “MySpace photos,” which often means, among other things, duckface.

TUMBLNOTE: This comic is awesome, but whoever posted it originally went to the trouble of reassembling it from a single row 4-panel comic into a 2-row, 2-column comic—and then didn’t bother to credit Kate Beaton of Hark, A Vagrant, who actually created it.  We call that plagiarism and I give out 0s and write letters to the Dean of Students about it EVERY DAMN SEMESTER.
I realize that many people would not look at this and think, “Oh, hey, Hark, a Vagrant,” but the content of the comic itself is pretty google-able, and there’s no excuse for not at least TRYING to find it and possibly including a note on a reblog along the lines of “oh, hey, does anyone know who made this?” if you’re not successful.  Because passing someone else’s work around for entertainment and making no effort to give them credit is a dick thing to do.  Avoid plagiarism not because it will result in the Wrath of Cabell (although it will*), but because it is WRONG.  Please.

*Seriously, my spouse made reference to this in our wedding vows.  It was relevant, I promise.  Everyone laughed because they know about my track record of plagiarist-catching.

Ahahahahahahahahahahaha.  I love this—a whole chapter of my dissertation is about profile pictures and photo albums, and a general theme through the whole thing (which is all about Facebook) is how norms develop, such as what kind of picture is seen as “good.”  Many interview participants have told me that they don’t like “MySpace photos,” which often means, among other things, duckface.

TUMBLNOTE: This comic is awesome, but whoever posted it originally went to the trouble of reassembling it from a single row 4-panel comic into a 2-row, 2-column comic—and then didn’t bother to credit Kate Beaton of Hark, A Vagrant, who actually created it.  We call that plagiarism and I give out 0s and write letters to the Dean of Students about it EVERY DAMN SEMESTER.

I realize that many people would not look at this and think, “Oh, hey, Hark, a Vagrant,” but the content of the comic itself is pretty google-able, and there’s no excuse for not at least TRYING to find it and possibly including a note on a reblog along the lines of “oh, hey, does anyone know who made this?” if you’re not successful.  Because passing someone else’s work around for entertainment and making no effort to give them credit is a dick thing to do.  Avoid plagiarism not because it will result in the Wrath of Cabell (although it will*), but because it is WRONG.  Please.

*Seriously, my spouse made reference to this in our wedding vows.  It was relevant, I promise.  Everyone laughed because they know about my track record of plagiarist-catching.

(via rip-samsteak-deactivated2012032)